Porcelain Publishing / CT / Volume 7 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.47297/wspctWSP2515-470207.20230702
ARTICLE

Theorizing Rewriting through "The Drover's Wife"

Xiang Li1
Show Less
1 School of Literature, Languages and Linguistics at the Australian National University,Canberra, Australia
© Invalid date by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This article delves into the practice of rewriting as a literary and cultural phenomenon by using "The Drover's Wife" rewritings as an example. One of the best-known short stories in Australian literature, Henry Lawson's story has inspired or, in some cases, provoked many Australian artists to create their versions of the drover's wife. By tracing the fascinating history of "The Drover's Wife" and the intertextual connections between various reworkings, this article considers how the practice of rewriting transforms a story into a cultural object and the complex phenomenon surrounding it. The article looks at the definition, history, functions and theoretical discussions of rewriting and argues that existing models tend to focus on linear connections between rewritings and their "source texts", which fall short of examining reworkings in "The Drover's Wife", due to the intricate interconnectedness between different versions as well as their political, cultural or ideological interventions. Incorporating previous studies on rewriting with Julie Sanders's "signifying fields'" and John Frow's concept of genre, it provides a new interpretative model to read similar phenomena of rewriting.

Keywords
Rewriting; "The Drover's Wife"; Intertextuality; (re)Interpretation; Reception
References

[1] Ashcroft, Bill, et al.The Empire Writes Back Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures.2nded, London Routledge,2002.

[2] Bail, Murray. "The Drover's Wife".The Drover's Wife, edited by Frank Moorhouse, Penguin Random House Australia,2017, pp.199–205.

[3] Barrett, Susan. "No Place for Woman? Barbara Baynton's Bush Studies".Journal of the Short Story in English, vol.40,2003, pp.85–96.

[4] Barthes, Roland, and Stephen Heath.Image, Music, Text: Essays. London: Fontana,1977.

[5] Călinescu, Matei. "Rewriting".International Postmodernism: Theory and Literary Practice, edited by Johannes Willem Bertens and Douwe Wessel Fokkema, Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins,1997.

[6] Carrera-Suarez, Isabel. "A Gendered Bush, Mansfield and Australian Drover's Wives".Australian Literary Studies, vol.15,no.2,1991, pp.140–48.

[7] Coste, Didier. "Rewriting, Literariness, Literary History".Revue LISA/LISA e-Journal. Littératures, Histoire Des Idées,Images, Sociétés Du Monde Anglophone – Literature, History of Ideas, Images and Societies of the English-Speaking World, no. Vol. II-n°5, Oct.2004, pp.8–25.

[8] Eagle, Mary. "Drysdale, Sir George Russell (1912–1981)". Australian Dictionary of Biography, National Centre of Biography, Australian National University, pp.336–38.Australian Dictionary of Biography, https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/drysdale-sir-george-russell-12439. Accessed 11 Aug.2021.

[9] Eggert, Paul.Biography of a Book: Henry Lawson's While the Billy Boils. University of Sydney, N.S.W.: Sydney University Press, in association with The Pennsylvania State University Press,2013.

[10] Frow, John.Genre. Second edition, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group,2015.

[11] Gates, Henry Louis.The Signifying Monkey: A Theory of African-American Literary Criticism. Oxford University Press,USA,1989.

[12] Genette, Gérard.Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. University of Nebraska Press,1997.

[13] Haneș, Ioana-Gianina. "About Two Concepts: Postmodernism and Rewriting".Journal of Humanistic and Social Studies, vol.9, no.1,2018, pp.51–60.

[14] Jauss, Hans Robert. "Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory".New Literary History, vol.2, no.1,1970, pp.7-37.

[15] Kossew, Sue.Writing Woman, Writing Place: Contemporary Australian and South African Fiction. London; New York,NY: Routledge,2004.

[16] Kristeva, Julia. "Word, Dialog and Novel".The Kristeva Reader, edited by Toril Moi, Columbia University Press,1986,pp.34–61.

[17] Latham M.A Poetics of Postmodernism and Neomodernism: Rewriting Mrs Dalloway. Springer,2015.

[18] Letissier, Georges, editor.Rewriting/Reprising: Plural Intertextualities. Cambridge Scholars,2009.

[19] Matthews, Brian. "Louisa and Henry and Gertie and the Drover's Wife".Australian Literary Studies, vol.9, no.3,1980,pp.286–97.

[20] Moraru, Christian.Rewriting: Postmodern Narrative and Cultural Critique in the Age of Cloning. SUNY Press,2001.

[21] Onega, Susana, et al.Refracting the Canon in Contemporary British Literature and Film. Rodopi,2004.

[22] Plate, Liedeke. "Women Readers Write Back: Rewriting and/as Reception".SPIEL: eine Zeitschrift fur Medienkultur, vol.19, no.1,2000, p.155.

[23] ---. Transforming Memories in Contemporary Women's Rewriting. Springer,2010.

[24] Radivoj, Monika. Magical Realism and Australian-Ness in Lisa Jacobson's "The Master Builder's Wife".2020.University of Zagreb.

[25] Reynolds, Felisa Vergara.The Author as Cannibal: Rewriting in Francophone Literature as a Postcolonial Genre,1969-1995. University of Nebraska Press,2021.

[26] Rich, Adrienne. "When We Dead Awaken: Writing as Re-Vision".College English, vol.34, no.1,1972, pp.18–30.

[27] Roderick, Colin Arthur. "Introduction".Henry Lawson Criticism,1894-1971, Angus and Robertson,1972, pp. xvii–xli.

[28] Sanders, Julie.Adaptation and Appropriation. Second edition, Routledge,2016.

[29] Schaffer, Kay.Women and the Bush: Forces of Desire in the Australian Cultural Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1988.

[30] Willis, Ika. "Reception Theory, Reception History, Reception Studies".Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature,edited by Paula Rabinowitz, Oxford University Press,2021.

[31] ---.Reception. Routledge,2018.[32] Yarbrough, Stephen R.After Rhetoric: The Study of Discourse beyond Language and Culture. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press,1999.

 

Share
Back to top
Critical Theory, Electronic ISSN: 2753-5193 Print ISSN: 2515-4702, Published by Porcelain Publishing