Porcelain Publishing / CT / Volume 8 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.47297/wspctWSP2515-470204.20240802
ARTICLE

Openness, Difference and Emptiness: the Three Dimension of Contemporary Western Writing Thought——Review of Qi Wang's Comprehensive Review of Contemporary Western Writing Theories Centering on Jean-Luc Nancy

Lijun Zhao1 Pengfei Gu2
Show Less
1 Faculty of Liberal Arts, Northwestern University, Xi'an 710127, China
2 School of Literature, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
© Invalid date by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Since Derrida's "writing revolution", the writing thought has become an independent philosophical proposition, beginning to break free from its marginalized state. As a medium that can convey meaning and directly communicate with people and the world, writing has strong theoretical tension and reflective value. Systematic reflection on Western writing ideas is also an important dimension in constructing the discourse of current Chinese literary theory. Qi Wang's Comprehensive Review of Contemporary Western Writing Theories Centering on Jean-Luc Nancy revolves around Jean Luc Nancy's writing thought and engages in an interactive dialogue with contemporary Western theories. This dialogue constructs three dimensions of writing thought by sorting out the relationship between writing and meaning, body, art, and literature: openness, difference, and emptiness. These three dimensions generate and promote each other, jointly constructing the multiple facets of Nancy's writing thought.

Keywords
Jean-Luc Nancy; Writing thought; Openness; Difference; Emptiness
References

[1]Wang Q.(2023).Comprehensive Review of Contemporary Western Writing Theories Centering on Jean-Luc Nancy.Hangzhou:Zhejiang Industary and Commerce Press.

[2]Nancy J L.(2015). La Communauté désoeuvrée. Translated by J. L. Guo. J.H. Zhao. Zhengzhou: Henan University Press.

[3]Nancy J L.(2007).The Thought of Alterity. Translated by K. J. Xia . Changchun:Jilin University Press.

[4]Heideger M.(2014).Being and Time.Translated by J.Y. Chen. Q. J. Wang. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing company.

[5]Hu. J H.(2005).The Ethical-Cultural Turn in a Postmodern Context: on Levinas, Derrida and Nancy. Beijing: Jinghua Press.

[6]Blanchot. M.(2003).Literary space. Translated by J. C. Gu. Beijing: The Commercial Press.

[7]Derrida. J.(2001).Writing and Differences. Translated by N. Zhan. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing company.

[8]Kellner. D. Best. S.(2011).Modern theory: critical questioning. Translated by Z. B. Zhan. Beijing: Central Complication & Translation Press.

[9]Wang Q.(2020). From " Loss of Community" to "Literary Commuinty" - On Nancy's Idea of Literary Community.Journal of Chinese Language and Literature Research.

[10]Wang Q.(2023). The sense of touch: an important mediator of writing and reading - A new look at Jean-Luc Nancy's writing thought.Literary Review.

[11]Xing J C.(2021). Post-theory and its related issues.Jouranl of Hebei Normal University(philosophy and social science Edition).

[12]Xia K J.(2022). Useless Sharing: Jean-Luc Nancy's Alternative Imagination of Humanity.Philosophical Trends.

[13]Nancy J L.(1993).Le Sens du monde. Paris: Galilée.

[14]Nancy J L.(1994). Le Muses. Paris: Galilée.

[15]Nancy J L.(1994).Être singulier pluriel. Paris: Galilée.

Share
Back to top
Critical Theory, Electronic ISSN: 2753-5193 Print ISSN: 2515-4702, Published by Porcelain Publishing