Porcelain Publishing / CT / Volume 8 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.47297/wspctWSP2515-470206.20240802
ARTICLE

Aesthetic Sensuous Community in the Lesser Arts: William Morris's Critique on Modernity 

Ying Lin1
Show Less
1 Department of English,College of Foreign Languages, Qufu Normal University,Qufu 273165, China
© Invalid date by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

William Morris criticized the aesthetic ugliness of the Victorian era, which is essentially an artist's way of critiquing capitalist modernity. He diagnosed Victorian society with a symptom of "the famine of art", and viewed it as an aesthetic representation of capitalist crisis. He thus elevated "the lesser arts" to stir a redistribution of the collective sensibilities within the community. This approach encouraged artists to return to craftsmanship and create art for the people. Such "aesthetic practice of everyday life," condensed in handicrafts, to some extent reconstructed the sensuous world of individuals and the collective, highlighting the theoretical foundation of Marxist philosophy of praxis. In this sense, everyone is an artist; this is both a way to realize the aesthetic sensuous community and to manifest Morris's socialist ideals.

Keywords
William Morris; Modernity; Aesthetic Sensuous Community; Handicraft
References

[1]Arnold, Matthew.Culture and Anarchy. New York: Oxford University Press,2006.

[2]Bosanquet, Bernard.A History of Aesthetic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2012.

[3]Engels, Friedrich.The Condition of the Working-Class in England in 1855. Trans. Florence Kelley Wischnewetzky.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2010.

[4]Franke, Ursula. "Baumgarten's Invention of Aesthetics". Ed. J. Colin McQuillan. Baumgarten's Aesthetics: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield,2021.

[5]Hobsbawm, E. J.The Age of Capital:1845-1875. London: Abacus,1975.

[6]Kelvin, Norman.The Collected Letters of William Morris Volume II Part A 1881-1884. Princeton: Princeton University Press,1984.

[7]Liu Jun:From Craftsman to Divine Artist: The Rise of the Artist Class in Renaissance Italy. Beijing: The Commercial Press,2018.

[8]Lu Xinghua:Art — The Future of Politics: A Study of Jacques Rancière's Aesthetic Thought. Beijing: The Commercial Press,2017.

[9]Marx, Karl.Selected Writings. Ed. Lawrence H. Simon. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc,1994.

[10]Morris, William.The Collected Works of William Morris Volume 22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2012.

[11]---.The Collected Works of William Morris Volume 23. Cambridge: Cambridge. University Press,2012.

[12]Rancière, Jacques.Aisthesis: Scenes from the Aesthetic Regime of Art. Trans. Zakir. Paul. London & New York: Verso,2013.

[13]Schiller, Friedrich.On the Aesthetic Education of Man. Trans. Reginald Snell. Bristol: Thoemmes Press,1994.

[14]Thompson, E. P.William Morris: Romantic to Revolutionary. New York: Pantheon,1976.

[15]Wellmer, Albrecht.On the Dialectics of Modernity and Postmodernity. Trans. Qin Wen. Beijing: The Commercial Press,2014.

Share
Back to top
Critical Theory, Electronic ISSN: 2753-5193 Print ISSN: 2515-4702, Published by Porcelain Publishing