The Postmodern Poetics of Landscape and Its Literary Representation
In the history of Western traditional aesthetics and art criticism, landscape has been regarded as an object gazed upon or a textual system deciphered from the perspective of the opposition between the subject and the object, existing in a static state. Postmodernism has brought a new paradigm shift in research, transitioning landscape studies from focusing on formal visuality to the research paths of semiotics and hermeneutics. It views landscape as a dynamic, transitional construct, a process of cultural practice that directly participates in an ecological revolution and the formation of a complex network of cultural, national, and political identities. The decoding of landscape as a utility of multiple cultural symbols has also led to an interdisciplinary combination with literature. Literary interpretation based on landscape strengthens the mediating function of landscape, primarily representing the interaction among landscape, power, nostalgia, and identity.
[1]Boym, Svetlana. The Future of Nostalgia[M]. A Member of the Perseus Books Group,2001.
[2]Cresswell, Tim. Place: an Introduction[M]. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell,2015.
[3]YI-FU TUAN. Topophilia[M]. New York: Columbia University Press,1974.
[4]W. J. T. Mitchell. Landscape and Power[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,2002.
[5]雷蒙·威廉斯.乡村与城市[M].韩子满,刘戈,徐珊珊,译.商务印书馆,2013.
[6]刘象愚,杨恒达,曾艳兵.从现代主义到后现代主义[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.
[7]温迪.J.达比.风景与认同:英国民族与阶级地理[M].张箭飞,赵红英,译.译林出版社,2011.
[8]吴瑾瑾.永远的重农主义—美国南方"重农派"文学运动研究[J].山东大学学报,2010(6).
[9]张箭飞.风景感知和视角—论沈从文的湘西风景[J].天津社会科学,2006(5).