Porcelain Publishing / JCHRM / Volume 12 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.47297/wspchrmWSP2040⁃800501.20211201
ARTICLE

Management Power, R&D and Enterprise Performance:Moderating Effect Based on Management Competence

Fan Wang 1,2 Junqing Quan 3 Juan Ni 4
Show Less
1 School of Accounting,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,China, School of Accounting,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,China
2 Audit Science Institute,National Audit Office of P.R. China, Audit Science Institute,National Audit Office of P.R. China
3 School of Accounting,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,P.R. China, School of Accounting,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,P.R. China
4 School of Public Finance and Taxation,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,P.R. China, School of Public Finance and Taxation,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,P.R. China
© Invalid date by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Purpose

This paper studies the relationship between management power, R&D and enterprise performance by selecting A-share listed companies in Shenzhen and Shanghai from 2007 to 2016. 

Design/methodology/approach

OLS regression 

Findings

The results show that management power is positively correlated with enterprise performance. There is a significant positive correlation between management power and R&D. That is, the more power the management has, the more likely it is to invest in venture capital and the more decision-making power it has, and the more attention it pays to achieve long-term development through R&D and innovation. R&D has a partially mediating effect between management power and enterprise performance. In addition, this paper also verifies that since R&D still has an impact on firm performance in the subsequent period, this mediating effect still holds in the subsequent period. Management ability has a positive moderating effect on the mediating effect of management power on firm performance through R&D. The moderating path is the first half of the mediating effect, that is, the stronger the management ability is, the more attention the management with power attaches to improving enterprise performance through increasing R&D. 

Originality/value

This article confirms that management power is positively correlated with enterprise performance 

 
Keywords
Management power
R&D
Enterprise performance
References
  • Donaldson Davis J HStewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns [J]. Australian Journal of Management199116(1): 49-95. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Flood P CSmith K GTop management teams and pioneering: A resource-based view [J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management19978(3): 291-306. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Zhou JianKing YuanyuanYuan DeliResearch on the influence of CEO's power of board of Directors Human Capital on FIRM'S R&D---Empirical evidence from high-tech listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets [J]. Journal ofScience of Science and Management of Science and Technology201334(3): 170-180. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Han LiyanLi HuiCEO Power and Financial Crisis: An Empirical Study of Chinese listed companies [J]. Journal of Financial Research2009, (1): 179-193. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Hu MingxiaManagerial power, technological innovation input and firm performance [J]. Journal of Science and Management of Science and Technology2015, (08): 140-147. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • He WeifengLiu WeiHuang KailiManagerial competence and enterprise risk-taking [J]. Journal of Chinese Soft Science2016, (5): 107-118. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Wang QingChou ZejiangFEMALE EXECUTIVES AND R&D: Empirical Evidence from China [J]. Journal of Management World2015, (3): 178-179. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Lu RuiAnalysis of managerial power, compensation and performance sensitivity: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies [J]. Journal of Contemporary Finance2008, (07): 107-112. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Fanlenbrach RüdigerShareholder Rights, Boards, a nd CEO Compensation [J]. Review of Finance2009, (13): 81-113. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Li ShengnanNiu JianboReview and basic framework construction of executive power research [J]. Journal of Foreign Economy and Management2014, (07): 3-13. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Zhang SanbaoZhang ZhixueManagerial Autonomy: The hand of plunder, the hand of inaction or the hand of support? [J]. Research on management of Journal of China University of Technology2014, (9): 153-173. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Xiong TingCheng BoPan FeiCEO Power, Product Market Competition and company R & D Investment [J]. Journal of the Shanxi University of Finance and Economics201638(5): 56-68. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Quan XiaofengWu ShinongPower intensity of CEO, quality of information disclosure and volatility of corporate performance---An empirical study on listed companies in Shenzhen Stock Exchange [J]. Journal Review of Nankai Management201013(4): 142-153. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • 14Wen ZhonglinYe BaojuanAnalysis of mediating effects: Methods and model development [J]. Journal of Psychology201422(05): 731-745. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • 15Wen ZhonglinYe BaojuanModerating intermediary model testing: competition or substitute? [J]. Journal of Psychology201446(05): 714-726. [Baidu Scholar] 
Share
Back to top
Journal of Chinese Human Resources Management, Electronic ISSN: 2040-8013 Print ISSN: 2040-8005, Published by Porcelain Publishing