Porcelain Publishing / JCHRM / Volume 11 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.47297/wspchrmWSP2040‐800503.20201101
ARTICLE

Work analysis and the future reform of HRM for China’s judicial system: a comparative study from the perspective of post system between China and the US

Yongqian Tu 1 Yimo Han 2 Ruijun Ma 3 Jingyi Gong 3
Show Less
1 School of Labor and Human Resources,Renmin University of China,China, School of Labor and Human Resources,Renmin University of China,China
2 School of Law,University of California,Los Angeles,United States, School of Law,University of California,Los Angeles,United States
3 School of Labor and Human Resources,Renmin University of China,China, School of Labor and Human Resources,Renmin University of China,China
© Invalid date by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Purpose

In the context of the current judicial responsibility system in China, under the background of the basic formation of the human resources classification management pattern and the establishment and operation of the new judicial power operation mechanism, how to carry out scientific and reasonable human resources classification, work analysis and systematic reconstruction of judicial human resources is a major problem that must be faced and optimized while directly promoting the reform of the post system, which is also the main purpose of this paper. 

Design/methodology/approach

On the basis of summarizing the characteristics of judicial system in China and the United States, this paper will draw lessons from the methods and mechanisms of judicial human resource management (HRM) system in the United States, and further provide research suggestions for the implementation of judicial post system reform in China. 

Findings

This paper summarizes the characteristics of the work analysis in judicial system in China and the United States, and finds out the problems and reasons for China's current judicial system work analysis and post system design via multiple related comparisons. 

Research implications

As the most important and difficult part of judicial reform, the post system reform is of great significance to promote the specialization and elitism of judges, improve the quality of case handling, and promote the fairness and justice of each case. Based on the summary of judicial human resource methods and the comparative study on the practice of China and the United States, this paper may be helpful to provide further suggestions for the reform of the post system in China's judicial system. 

Originality/value

This paper summarizes the methods of human resource management in judicial system, especially workload estimation, and focuses on the weighted case volume model of the United States. By comparing the case studies of post system design between China and the United States, this paper provides a scientific method for China's post system reform in the future. 

Keywords
Post system
weighted case number method
work analysis
workload
References
  • Ostrom Brian J., and Roger A. Hanson (2000), "Efficiency, Timeliness, and Quality: A New Perspective from Nine State Criminal Trial Courts."VANational Center for State Courts, Williamsburg. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Caylor Steven. (2000), "Measuring the Need for Judges: Rationalizing the Allocation of Judicial Resources."Institute for Court Management, Court Executive Development Program, Phase III Project, National Center for State CourtsWilliamsburg, VA. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • NCSC (National Center for State Courts). (2007), "A Workload Assessment Study for the New Mexico Trial Court Judiciary, New Mexico District Attorneys' Offices, and New Mexico Public Defender Department."National Center for State CourtsWilliamsburg, VA. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Anonymous. (2000)."Lord Chancellor's Department Consultation Paper"Lord Chancellor's DepartmentLondon. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Jacoby Joan. (1987), "Caseweighting Systems for Prosecutors: Guidelines and Procedures."Washington, DCU.S. Department of Justice. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Flango Victor E.Brian J. OstromFlango Carol R.. (1993), "How do States Determine the Need for Judges?"State Court Journal 17 (3):3-11. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Aikman Alexander B.Pedersen D. Kurt, and Roper Robert T.. (1998), "Designing a Judgeship Needs Process for Florida."Gryphon Consulting ServicesEureka, CA. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Aikman Alexander B.Pedersen D. Kurt, and Roper Robert T.. (1999), "Assessing the Need for New Trial Courts/Judgeships: National Survey of States."Texas Judicial Council. 1998-1999 Texas Judicial Council Annual Report, Committee on Judicial Performance Measures Staff ReportsTexas Judicial CouncilAustin, TX, available at http://www.courts.state.tx.us/tjc/ar99/report.htm. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Deutscher Richterbund (1999), "Stellungnahme zu einer Richterarbeitsplatz-Untersuchung (Response to Study on judicial staffing)."Berlin. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Tragter-Schubert Martina (1999), "New Control Models for the Dutch Courts-or the long road to Quality."Betriff Justiz16:2182000; available at http://www.betrifftjustiz.de/texte/frame.php?ID=Tragter-Schubert.html&wb_2947_session_id=oimoeach5l2ponif2ruu9284b1. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • NCSC (National Center for State Courts). (2009), "Kosovo Justice Support Program Annual Report June 2008-June 2009."U.S. Agency for International DevelopmentWashington, DC. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • NCSC (National Center for State Courts). (2010), "Oregon Court of Appeals Judicial and Staff Weighted Caseload Study."National Center for State CourtsWashington, DC. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • William Childs (2015), "The Administrative Office of the Courts: Workload and human resources."Fiscal Research DivisionMarch 3. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Anonymous (2016), "In Re: Certification of Need for Additional Judges."Supreme Court of Florida. No. SC16-2127. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Anonymous (2016), "Florida Judicial Workload Assessment Final Report", available at http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/pub_info/documents/2016-NCSC-Florida-Workload-Study.pdf. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Zhao R.G. (2018)."Research on Collegiate System under the background of judicial reform."BeijingLaw Press. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Guo J. XZhao Y.Wang Y.Q. (2016), "The new trial team of Beijing No.2 Middle court is in full operation."People's court newsOctober 15. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Ma Y.J. (2016), "System function and reform path of trial team under judicial responsibility system."Application of law, (11):97-102. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Chen R.H. (2018), "Theoretical reflection on the reform of the post system of judges."Jurist, (3):1-14191. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Ge X. G. (2018), "Practical interpretation of the construction of a new trial team in grassroots courts under the background of post system reform."People's court journalJune 28. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Zhang W. (2010), "Research on human resource performance management of judicial organs in China."Harbin Engineering University. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Wang C.C. (2019), "Research on the post system of judges in China."Jilin University. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Yin Z.X. (2013), "Research on the allocation and utilization of judicial human resources." Journal of Shandong Judge Training College (Shandong trial), (2):23-27. [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Cao W.J. (2015), "Review of human resource management in public sector."Shang, (40):33 [Baidu Scholar] 
  • Chang L.Zhang R.F. (2015), "Human resource management innovation in public sector: Theoretical Review and research prospect."Jianghan forum (12):136-139. [Baidu Scholar] 
Share
Back to top
Journal of Chinese Human Resources Management, Electronic ISSN: 2040-8013 Print ISSN: 2040-8005, Published by Porcelain Publishing